<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PTCL Separation Scheme Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telecompk.net/2007/10/22/ptcl-separation-scheme-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telecompk.net/2007/10/22/ptcl-separation-scheme-plans/</link>
	<description>A blog about telecommunication marketplace in Pakistan with news, information, analysis and trends</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Engr.Abdul Razzaque Memon</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2007/10/22/ptcl-separation-scheme-plans/#comment-6868</link>
		<dc:creator>Engr.Abdul Razzaque Memon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2007/10/22/ptcl-separation-scheme-plans/#comment-6868</guid>
		<description>I have Bad experience of the recent PTCL Management, one: No one is attending telephone calls on 021 4638244 , 021 4613615 if then without listening it is diverted to Hakeem sahib, Shahid sahib etc. I tried following numbers too sdo1 majis esq 4613615, 4610015/14 sdo2 , 4610028, 4614994.
EX SDO Hafiz Sahib was a good listner &#38; helpfull person, nut new SDO not available always at SITE, Beneath Staff disconnect calls despite various complaints. in past ISB/PTCL Managment /Authorities were also listeners &#38; problem resolvers as had their E-mail addresses, this Management have not mentioned &#38; not in contact through E-mails, Phones, Personnel Visits. My problem lasting since 3 years bad very bad since last 4 monrths, my phone NBr is 021 4630054 its Dead since 3 months , despite complaints no one attending it, lineman needs bribe of RS100-300 to rectify, others had paid &#38; their phone is OK, for my official phone..? I dont want to pay bribe to release 021 463005. What about you to suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Bad experience of the recent PTCL Management, one: No one is attending telephone calls on 021 4638244 , 021 4613615 if then without listening it is diverted to Hakeem sahib, Shahid sahib etc. I tried following numbers too sdo1 majis esq 4613615, 4610015/14 sdo2 , 4610028, 4614994.<br />
EX SDO Hafiz Sahib was a good listner &amp; helpfull person, nut new SDO not available always at SITE, Beneath Staff disconnect calls despite various complaints. in past ISB/PTCL Managment /Authorities were also listeners &amp; problem resolvers as had their E-mail addresses, this Management have not mentioned &amp; not in contact through E-mails, Phones, Personnel Visits. My problem lasting since 3 years bad very bad since last 4 monrths, my phone NBr is 021 4630054 its Dead since 3 months , despite complaints no one attending it, lineman needs bribe of RS100-300 to rectify, others had paid &amp; their phone is OK, for my official phone..? I dont want to pay bribe to release 021 463005. What about you to suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State of Telecom Industry in Pakistan &#187; PTCL Voluntary Separation Scheme Announced</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2007/10/22/ptcl-separation-scheme-plans/#comment-5017</link>
		<dc:creator>State of Telecom Industry in Pakistan &#187; PTCL Voluntary Separation Scheme Announced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2007/10/22/ptcl-separation-scheme-plans/#comment-5017</guid>
		<description>[...] According to insiders, this scheme works well for those who are relatively new at PTCL. As I have written before, if PTCL management handles this well, then this could be good for both the company and its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to insiders, this scheme works well for those who are relatively new at PTCL. As I have written before, if PTCL management handles this well, then this could be good for both the company and its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTCL_Engr</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2007/10/22/ptcl-separation-scheme-plans/#comment-3791</link>
		<dc:creator>PTCL_Engr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2007/10/22/ptcl-separation-scheme-plans/#comment-3791</guid>
		<description>Its delayed again.Donno whats going on in this company.One thing that I have learnt in PTCL is-Never believe in what PTCL Management says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its delayed again.Donno whats going on in this company.One thing that I have learnt in PTCL is-Never believe in what PTCL Management says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
