<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Djuice.Pk Goes To Telenor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/</link>
	<description>A blog about telecommunication marketplace in Pakistan with news, information, analysis and trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:02:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: owais</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-43931</link>
		<dc:creator>owais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-43931</guid>
		<description>For all the Telenor Users there is a recent update ..Comment here if you have any queries in this regard...

Dear Telenor Family,

Effective 1st of Feb 2009 all new prepaid SIMs (which are not First Call Activation till 31st Jan) will be activated once the subscriber dials 789 (from the new SIM purchased) &amp; verifies his CNIC (Computerized National Identity Card). All activations for subscribers who do not have CNICs but carry passports and other documents will be carried out at Telenor Sales &amp; Service Centers.

This is an industry wide step, initiated by PTA &amp; implemented by all telecom operators to ensure subscriber security. Together all cellular operators have already launched an advertising campaign to communicate this important news to the market.

Telenor S&amp;D , CRD  and  IT and  along with many other teams have also made special arrangements to make this new process as smooth as possible for all our new joining customers.  

A Telenor specific media campaign will also go on-air on the subject from 1st Feb.

Kindly feel free to share this very important development with all your teams and business partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the Telenor Users there is a recent update ..Comment here if you have any queries in this regard&#8230;</p>
<p>Dear Telenor Family,</p>
<p>Effective 1st of Feb 2009 all new prepaid SIMs (which are not First Call Activation till 31st Jan) will be activated once the subscriber dials 789 (from the new SIM purchased) &amp; verifies his CNIC (Computerized National Identity Card). All activations for subscribers who do not have CNICs but carry passports and other documents will be carried out at Telenor Sales &amp; Service Centers.</p>
<p>This is an industry wide step, initiated by PTA &amp; implemented by all telecom operators to ensure subscriber security. Together all cellular operators have already launched an advertising campaign to communicate this important news to the market.</p>
<p>Telenor S&amp;D , CRD  and  IT and  along with many other teams have also made special arrangements to make this new process as smooth as possible for all our new joining customers.  </p>
<p>A Telenor specific media campaign will also go on-air on the subject from 1st Feb.</p>
<p>Kindly feel free to share this very important development with all your teams and business partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZAHID</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-43786</link>
		<dc:creator>ZAHID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-43786</guid>
		<description>Dear  ALL
 
Good day
 
 Plz solve my another problem that i purchased new sim 1month ago # 0343-3030737 but now it is not working properly when i insert sim own mobile so its not working mobile display &quot;insert sim&quot; Why i am not getting this matter Plz check it why is it not working, It is registard to KAMRAN JALBANI, NIC# 42301-9748461-9 plz solve it and reply by mail.
 
best regard
Zahid Khan
A.M Pricing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear  ALL</p>
<p>Good day</p>
<p> Plz solve my another problem that i purchased new sim 1month ago # 0343-3030737 but now it is not working properly when i insert sim own mobile so its not working mobile display &#8220;insert sim&#8221; Why i am not getting this matter Plz check it why is it not working, It is registard to KAMRAN JALBANI, NIC# 42301-9748461-9 plz solve it and reply by mail.</p>
<p>best regard<br />
Zahid Khan<br />
A.M Pricing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waqar husain</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-28842</link>
		<dc:creator>waqar husain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-28842</guid>
		<description>bicoott using telenor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bicoott using telenor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZAK</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-22675</link>
		<dc:creator>ZAK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-22675</guid>
		<description>Totally agreed with MANSOOR,

I think every body should go to all the Pakistani Forums and should convery this message, so that maximum people can aware to this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agreed with MANSOOR,</p>
<p>I think every body should go to all the Pakistani Forums and should convery this message, so that maximum people can aware to this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mansoor</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-17631</link>
		<dc:creator>Mansoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-17631</guid>
		<description>What I do not understand is that who is incharge of PKNIC and why it is not under Pakistan Government Control.  

Network Solutions had to shared the registry with other domain registrars so how come one man show in Santa Clara California has full control over a whole countries TLD?

Problems with PKNIC

1) No Contact information for people or phone numbers
2) No SLA for support
3) Has a policy to rip off customers.  When the whole world allows 1 yr registration, they force 2 year registration.
4) Only discloses one email address which is staff@pknic.net.pk for support.  Sending emails to this address does not provide you with any ticket number so that you can follow up with your requests or complaints.
5) It takes them weeks to answer their emails
6) They expect you to send cheques to Lahore with no real way of following up if the payment rec&#039;d

Basically it looks like some guy sitting in Santa Clara California is holding on to the balls of the entire country&#039;s TLD. 

I would like to start a petition with Government of Pakistan to take away the .PK registry system and implement it within country and have checks and balances with open community monitoring system.

The domain registry prices should be fair since $15.00 is unfair for a poor country like Pakistan when a rich country like US can offer it for only $7.00.  People should not be forced to register for two years min.  A proper SLA much be provided by PKNIC and PKNIC should have to make public all complaints and resolutions.

Who is with me on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I do not understand is that who is incharge of PKNIC and why it is not under Pakistan Government Control.  </p>
<p>Network Solutions had to shared the registry with other domain registrars so how come one man show in Santa Clara California has full control over a whole countries TLD?</p>
<p>Problems with PKNIC</p>
<p>1) No Contact information for people or phone numbers<br />
2) No SLA for support<br />
3) Has a policy to rip off customers.  When the whole world allows 1 yr registration, they force 2 year registration.<br />
4) Only discloses one email address which is <a href="mailto:staff@pknic.net.pk">staff@pknic.net.pk</a> for support.  Sending emails to this address does not provide you with any ticket number so that you can follow up with your requests or complaints.<br />
5) It takes them weeks to answer their emails<br />
6) They expect you to send cheques to Lahore with no real way of following up if the payment rec&#8217;d</p>
<p>Basically it looks like some guy sitting in Santa Clara California is holding on to the balls of the entire country&#8217;s TLD. </p>
<p>I would like to start a petition with Government of Pakistan to take away the .PK registry system and implement it within country and have checks and balances with open community monitoring system.</p>
<p>The domain registry prices should be fair since $15.00 is unfair for a poor country like Pakistan when a rich country like US can offer it for only $7.00.  People should not be forced to register for two years min.  A proper SLA much be provided by PKNIC and PKNIC should have to make public all complaints and resolutions.</p>
<p>Who is with me on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Imtiaz Shafiq</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-14985</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Imtiaz Shafiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-14985</guid>
		<description>Dear Faried Nawaz

Thanks for your comments 

&quot;&quot;I’m pretty sure that the the composition of PKNIC or DNDRC has nothing to do with Telenor launching djuice as a brand months before you registered djuice.pk.&quot;&quot;

Well the composition of PKNIC or DNDRC does matter. As I said earlier I fully respect the ICANN and PKNIC rules. But in this particular case PKNIC and a so called organization DNDRC have violated their own rules to decide an illegal transfer of the doimain djuice.pk. 

In PKNIC terms and conditions it is written  

&quot;&quot;&quot;PKNIC reserves the right to cancel, or transfer the domain to the claiming party as per the ICANN&#039;s Uniform Domain Name Dispute&quot;&quot;&quot;

But no dispute have been started with me. No ICANN&#039;s Uniform Domain Name Dispute procedure have been followed.

DNDRC by itself is not listed at ICANN Approved Providers for Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy http://www.icann.org/dndr/udrp/approved-providers.htm

So how can you expect a judicious decision from them. Well In my case I am sure that I had registered djuice.pk before telenor  got a approved trade mark. Otherwise they would have defiantly registered this domain during the Sunrise Period of PKNIC .pk domains. During sunrise period only Trade Mark owner are given an opportunity to register a domain. 

For me it does not matter what would have been the result of the Domain Dispute I would have fully respected the decision if this have been followed legally and as per rules. 

Anyhow I would thanks every one for their comments especially to Baber Bhatti and his comment 

&quot;Your readers will follow you regardless of the address change, its just a matter of time.&quot;

Yes you are right I have shifted my site to http://djuiceblog.com and all my readers have already approached this new address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Faried Nawaz</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;I’m pretty sure that the the composition of PKNIC or DNDRC has nothing to do with Telenor launching djuice as a brand months before you registered djuice.pk.&#8221;"</p>
<p>Well the composition of PKNIC or DNDRC does matter. As I said earlier I fully respect the ICANN and PKNIC rules. But in this particular case PKNIC and a so called organization DNDRC have violated their own rules to decide an illegal transfer of the doimain djuice.pk. </p>
<p>In PKNIC terms and conditions it is written  </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"PKNIC reserves the right to cancel, or transfer the domain to the claiming party as per the ICANN&#8217;s Uniform Domain Name Dispute&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>But no dispute have been started with me. No ICANN&#8217;s Uniform Domain Name Dispute procedure have been followed.</p>
<p>DNDRC by itself is not listed at ICANN Approved Providers for Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy <a href="http://www.icann.org/dndr/udrp/approved-providers.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/dndr/udrp/approved-providers.htm</a></p>
<p>So how can you expect a judicious decision from them. Well In my case I am sure that I had registered djuice.pk before telenor  got a approved trade mark. Otherwise they would have defiantly registered this domain during the Sunrise Period of PKNIC .pk domains. During sunrise period only Trade Mark owner are given an opportunity to register a domain. </p>
<p>For me it does not matter what would have been the result of the Domain Dispute I would have fully respected the decision if this have been followed legally and as per rules. </p>
<p>Anyhow I would thanks every one for their comments especially to Baber Bhatti and his comment </p>
<p>&#8220;Your readers will follow you regardless of the address change, its just a matter of time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes you are right I have shifted my site to <a href="http://djuiceblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://djuiceblog.com</a> and all my readers have already approached this new address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faried Nawaz</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-14858</link>
		<dc:creator>Faried Nawaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-14858</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure that the the composition of PKNIC or DNDRC has nothing to do with Telenor launching djuice as a brand months before you registered djuice.pk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that the the composition of PKNIC or DNDRC has nothing to do with Telenor launching djuice as a brand months before you registered djuice.pk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Imtiaz Shafiq</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-14744</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Imtiaz Shafiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-14744</guid>
		<description>Before answering any question or to explain any thing above, 

I have few questions for which I am looking for answers. 

1. What is actually DNDRC (Domain Dispute Resolution Center) ? Is this
a reality or just a myth

2. Is this an Organization (non-profit base) or a private company?

3. What is the actual composition of the DNDRC? i.e is there any
supervisory from the Govt. of Pakistan?

4. Is this an ICANN or IANA approved body? 

5. Here is a list of Approved Providers for Uniform Domain-Name
Dispute-Resolution Policy
http://www.icann.org/dndr/udrp/approved-providers.htm, I wounder why
this so called Domain Dispute Resolution Center is not there in this
list. 

I am very surprised to know that PKNIC is being control by Mr. Ashar
Nisar and DNDRC by Mr. Jamil &amp; Co? 

This all seems to be one man show in both organizations/companies.
Please correct me if I am wrong 

With Regards
Imtiaz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before answering any question or to explain any thing above, </p>
<p>I have few questions for which I am looking for answers. </p>
<p>1. What is actually DNDRC (Domain Dispute Resolution Center) ? Is this<br />
a reality or just a myth</p>
<p>2. Is this an Organization (non-profit base) or a private company?</p>
<p>3. What is the actual composition of the DNDRC? i.e is there any<br />
supervisory from the Govt. of Pakistan?</p>
<p>4. Is this an ICANN or IANA approved body? </p>
<p>5. Here is a list of Approved Providers for Uniform Domain-Name<br />
Dispute-Resolution Policy<br />
<a href="http://www.icann.org/dndr/udrp/approved-providers.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/dndr/udrp/approved-providers.htm</a>, I wounder why<br />
this so called Domain Dispute Resolution Center is not there in this<br />
list. </p>
<p>I am very surprised to know that PKNIC is being control by Mr. Ashar<br />
Nisar and DNDRC by Mr. Jamil &amp; Co? </p>
<p>This all seems to be one man show in both organizations/companies.<br />
Please correct me if I am wrong </p>
<p>With Regards<br />
Imtiaz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babar Bhatti</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-14523</link>
		<dc:creator>Babar Bhatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-14523</guid>
		<description>Faried has made valid points.

Imtiaz - I hear what you are saying. I agree that the way this case was handled was not right. However given all the details, I do not think that the end result would have been different. Your readers will follow you regardless of the address change, its just a matter of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faried has made valid points.</p>
<p>Imtiaz &#8211; I hear what you are saying. I agree that the way this case was handled was not right. However given all the details, I do not think that the end result would have been different. Your readers will follow you regardless of the address change, its just a matter of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umar</title>
		<link>http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/comment-page-1/#comment-14476</link>
		<dc:creator>Umar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://telecompk.net/2008/04/21/djuicepk-goes-to-telenor/#comment-14476</guid>
		<description>This is what I think, PKNIC did.

Telenor approached them with their demand. Instead of following procedure, they simply ignored Mr. Imtiaz Shafiq and went on with their action.

Considering the law and order situation in the country, they don&#039;t expect Mr. Imtiaz to be taking legal action against them. And they thought that whoever Mr. Imtiaz be, probability of him filling a suite against Telenor and PKNIC is quite low, so therefore its alright to let go of procedure and do as they want.

Mr. Imtiaz himself agrees to the fact that he would respect PKNIC&#039;s rules and regulations, but taking his blog away without notification and procedure is simply law of the jungle.

@ Mr. Imtiaz. I seriously suggest you to file a suite against PKNIC. As soon as higher ups of Telenor find out about this hitting the media, they will come running to you to find an amicable settlement. We do not have a very strong judiciary at the moment, but we do have improving media and it might just help your case. Therefore, my suggestion would be, if you think you have been wronged, don&#039;t leave everything on Allah before you have tried your 100% and first fought for it yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I think, PKNIC did.</p>
<p>Telenor approached them with their demand. Instead of following procedure, they simply ignored Mr. Imtiaz Shafiq and went on with their action.</p>
<p>Considering the law and order situation in the country, they don&#8217;t expect Mr. Imtiaz to be taking legal action against them. And they thought that whoever Mr. Imtiaz be, probability of him filling a suite against Telenor and PKNIC is quite low, so therefore its alright to let go of procedure and do as they want.</p>
<p>Mr. Imtiaz himself agrees to the fact that he would respect PKNIC&#8217;s rules and regulations, but taking his blog away without notification and procedure is simply law of the jungle.</p>
<p>@ Mr. Imtiaz. I seriously suggest you to file a suite against PKNIC. As soon as higher ups of Telenor find out about this hitting the media, they will come running to you to find an amicable settlement. We do not have a very strong judiciary at the moment, but we do have improving media and it might just help your case. Therefore, my suggestion would be, if you think you have been wronged, don&#8217;t leave everything on Allah before you have tried your 100% and first fought for it yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
